Mislabeling Iran
A persistent and telling mischaracterization haunts the Western analysis of the upheaval in Iran: the tendency to call it a “revolution.” The term is convenient. It flatters foreign observers with a sense of witnessing raw history and absolves governments with a veneer of non-interference. It frames events as something new, chaotic, and internal, a spectacle to be monitored from a safe distance.
This framing is not just inaccurate; it is a profound disservice to the Iranian people. They are not demanding an experiment. They are demanding a return.
To mistake the nature of this moment is to misunderstand its roots. Iran today is not whispering in code or sending mixed signals. The nation is shaking. From Tehran to the provinces, from major cities to long-forgotten towns, a political earthquake is expressed not through foreign intermediaries or elite conferences, but through the raw power of ordinary citizens flooding public spaces. Their unified chant is for Reza Pahlavi and only Reza Pahlavi. It is a cry for a reconnection with their pre-theocratic past. This is not the sound of an artificial opposition or a Western project. It is a national roar.
To comprehend the full weight of this demand, and to see why continued Western hesitation risks repeating one of the most catastrophic foreign policy failures of the last century, we must return to the original sin: 1979.
The Original Sin: 1979
That year was not merely a revolution; it was a betrayal. The Shah of Iran, and the nation that looked to America as a strategic ally, believed in its deep friendship with the West. By the late 1970s, the Shah had become too independent for Western interests. He controlled Iran’s oil and refused to bend to pressure to sell it cheaply or surrender national control. At the same time, Iran’s military had grown into one of the most powerful non-nuclear forces in the world, ranked fourth globally.
The Carter administration, aided by European powers, most notably France, which provided sanctuary, and the UK and Germany, which granted legitimacy, actively enabled Ayatollah Khomeini’s rise. Western media amplified his message; diplomacy smoothed his return. When he descended from that Air France flight, the world was bizarrely told it was witnessing a “liberation.”
What followed was the theft of a nation. This was no simple miscalculation. It was a deliberate abdication of moral and strategic responsibility that consigned Iran to clerical tyranny. Just speak to any Iranian, inside or outside of Iran, and mention the name Carter. The blame, the resentment, and the sense of betrayal are palpable. Iranians see him not as a mere politician, but as a Judas who helped steal their nation’s future.
And the bill for that treacherous act has come due, paid in the currency of blood and stability: the thousands upon thousands of Iranian lives lost to brutal internal repression; the hundreds of American service members killed from Beirut to Baghdad by the regime’s proxies and terrorism; relentless nuclear brinkmanship. The damage of 1979 did not end; it metastasized, shaping the very instability that now threatens international security and American interests.
Iran Today
Now, nearly half a century later, the Iranian people are doing something extraordinary: they are reclaiming their voice, loudly and at immense personal risk. And yet, Western governments, paralyzed by the ghost of “regime change” and fear of accusations of interference, are hesitating once more. They fear being blamed for outcomes. This moment, however, is not about imposing a future on Iran. It is about removing the thumb that has been on the scale since 1979.
On January 2, President Trump warned the regime that if peaceful protesters were harmed, the U.S. would respond. Yet since that warning, about 20 more have been killed, adding to the 42 already lost - numbers that are likely far higher. The arrests climb above 2,000. In a more recent Fox News interview, President Trump reiterated the same sentiment, underscoring that the regime’s brutality is neither unseen nor unanswered.
The people themselves have shown the power of clear support: as soon as President Trump issued his warnings, more protesters filled the streets, and his image was plastered as a symbol of potential deliverance. The moment for moral clarity is no longer theoretical; it is urgent. The Iranian people, who believed in the promise of that statement, now ask: Will you act?
President Trump has framed his presidency as one of rectification, seeking to reverse the damaging legacies of previous administrations. That imperative does not stop at the water’s edge. The most profound and festering foreign policy failure awaiting atonement is Carter’s. While the world fears “regime change,” this is a misnomer: what is happening in Iran is regime rejection by its own people. The West’s role today is not to impose a future, but to remove the barriers it helped create, ending a half-century of enabling theocracy and allowing Iranians to reclaim their own will. This requires matching rhetoric with tangible action to support a population under siege.
The tools at hand are neither radical nor unprecedented: satellite internet like Starlink can bypass state blackouts to keep Iran connected; satellites and drones can monitor the regime’s violent movements from above; these same capabilities can identify and, if necessary, neutralize operatives attacking civilians. VPNs and digital circumvention tools can be deployed at scale, emergency corridors secured for journalists and medics, and public warnings backed by credible threats of force.
President Trump has already drawn a clear red line, warning that harm to peaceful protesters would require the regime ‘to answer to him.’ But a warning is only credible if there is political will to enforce it. The lights must not go out in Iran, and the world has the means to keep them on. To confront the system it helped install is to actively empower the citizens of Iran - technologically, diplomatically, and if necessary, militarily - a people fighting to reclaim their stolen future.
Settling a Historic Debt
This is not intervention. It is correction. This is not about placing America in Iran’s debt ledger; it is about settling a historic moral obligation. Carter helped steal a nation’s future. President Trump has the opportunity to help restore it.
The Iranian people are risking their lives in the streets, demanding the restoration of sovereignty, constitutional monarchy, and the right to choose a future free from clerical coercion. They are not asking for a new future to be built, they are asking for the one stolen from them to be returned.
The logic of correction applies as directly as it does in U.S. domestic politics. The Carter chapter is unfinished, not because America must control Iran’s destiny, but because Western decisions violently denied Iranians the right to determine it for themselves. History judges outcomes, not intentions. The scars of past Western hesitation and false restraint remain vivid. Ignoring the courageous voice of Iran today is not neutrality, it is repeating the betrayal.
Iran is speaking now with the force of a nation reclaiming itself. This is not a new Iran being invented. It is an old Iran being restored. Supporting this restoration is neither charity nor control, it is the final act in correcting a historic wrong.
For President Trump, who has built a legacy on overturning failed policies, this is the ultimate opportunity for atonement. The decision rests with him as leader of the West. He can cement his legacy as the president who corrected America’s greatest Middle East error, or he can let history repeat itself. Iran’s future, and America’s honor, hang in the balance.
Restoration, Mr. President!