There Is No Moral Center in Europe
There is no moral center in Europe. Not historically, not structurally, not in practice. Over the last two centuries, when have France, the United Kingdom, Belgium, Germany, or Italy moved to unify the continent out of principle rather than fear, exhaustion, or collapse? When strong, they competed, carved, and burned the place down. When weak, they discovered ethics.
European unity has never been a moral project. It has been a containment strategy; a mechanism designed to prevent another round of self-inflicted catastrophe. The institutions followed the wreckage, not the other way around. History did not bend toward cooperation because of enlightenment. It bent because the alternative had become intolerable.
What we are seeing now is not a European awakening. It is movement induced by gravity. The United States is finally re-internalizing its role in the international system, and Europe is responding to the return of weight. For decades, American power subsidized European comfort. That arrangement allowed Europe to posture ethically while outsourcing deterrence. That era is ending.
Let me be unambiguous. I unequivocally reject any notion of American imperialism in Europe. There will be no wars between brothers. Let that stand on its own. There is no hedging here, no softening, no rhetorical escape hatch.
But there is a dark, almost bitter humor in how this moment is unfolding. Some are only now discovering that free higher education does not confer a moral license to curate humanity, and that expansive social spending does not magically produce a civilizational compass. Comfort is not character. Administrative competence is not power.
Power Is Not a Seminar
Power does not emerge from seminars or policy papers. It comes from war. It comes from killing. It comes from the credible willingness to apply overwhelming violence. The modern order was not debated into existence; it was forced into being when the United States dropped atomic weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. That act ended a world war, shattered an imperial system, and rewired global power forever. You do not have to celebrate it, but you do have to understand it. The peace that followed was not a triumph of ethics. It was terror successfully applied. Every alliance, norm, and institution that came after rests on that foundation. Forgetting this is not moral progress; it is historical illiteracy.
Europe is allied to the strongest military in the world. Alliances carry obligations that are not sustained by simply virtue signaling. America can carry on without Europe; it would prefer not to. Deterrence only works if it is shared. Spend more on your armed forces. Act unilaterally and bilaterally when security demands it, not when it feels comfortable. Posture is cheap. Capability is not.
I say this as an American who grew up comfortably in a wealthy corner of Boston, and as a man who volunteered as an enlisted soldier in a family of officers. I understand both sides of the American psyche: confidence and insecurity; generosity and grievance. Approaching this moment purely as social commentary misses the point.
Americans respond to recognition. When Europeans acknowledge what the United States has done well, the conversation opens. This is not flattery. It is cultural literacy. Your leaders understand this instinct clearly enough when dealing with Donald Trump, whose expectations are harder to manage than most. He is operating at the outer edge of his competence, and he knows it. Bitterness follows.
There are things worth acknowledging. The joint U.S. - European support of Ukraine has been a rare moment of strategic alignment. The American-led NATO intervention in the Balkans reduced mass suffering, cost no NATO lives, and produced durable alliances. Afghanistan was riddled with failure, but it was also an attempt to dismantle a regime that treated half the population as subhuman. That mattered. It was an imperfect fight against a real evil.
The United Kingdom is part of this equation too. There is a long ledger to answer for, but a reasonable course correction begins with reality, not symbolism. Retaining control of Diego Garcia matters. Power projection demands geography, logistics, and permanence. Diego Garcia enables sustained reach across the Middle East, East Africa, and the Indo-Pacific without dependence on fragile regional partners. It is not a colonial relic. It is a keystone. Surrendering strategic nodes in the name of moral tidiness does not produce justice. It produces vacuum.
The uncomfortable truth is this: the European Union now has a role to play not as a junior partner, but as a stabilizing force. Americans have lost their grip on the steering wheel. Trump cannot be controlled, but he still needs Europe more than he understands. He panders to his voters. Adults must manage the trajectory.
No Surrender
It is past time to take stock of who we are. We are the West, not as a slogan or a brand, but as a civilizational project shaped by catastrophe, argument, reform, and force. We have never been fragile. We have never been pure. We endure because we absorb shock, correct course, and move forward, often inelegantly, sometimes late, but with an instinct for survival our critics chronically underestimate.
There will be no wars among brothers. There will be no surrender to intimidation masquerading as moral insight. Responsibility will be shared. Power will be maintained. Deterrence will be credible.
We are still here. And we are not finished.
